English for Specific Purposes
(ESP)
Rudi Hadi Suwarno
Abstract
This
paper first defines the 'English for Specific Purposes' (ESP). Meaning of ESP is a
learner-centred approach to teaching English as an additional language, which
focuses on developing communicative competence in a specific discipline. In this
paper, fourth parts are addressed: 1) The definition of ESP, 2) The differences
of ESP and EGP, 3) The purpose of learning ESP, and 4) Some examples of ESP
material to learn. The aim of this paper is to show understanding of ESP
(English for Specific Purpose).
INTRODUCTION
The study of the
English language is very important nowadays. It is the basis for better
communication between people either specialists or not. Today English is the
channel for technical progress as it enables the rapid exchange of information
and research of the common global problems. Any specialist of any science field
should properly use both ESP and EGP in order to communicate any specialized
and nonspecialized subject for professionally oriented activities.
English
for Specific Purposes (ESP) is a learner-centred approach to teaching English
as an additional language, which focuses on developing communicative competence
in a specific discipline, such as accounting, business, education, engineering,
IT technology, academic writing and learning. Students are also
exposed to Indonesian
business or academic culture and real world communication practice. According Hutchinson
and Waters (1987, p. 19) as cited in Tsao (2011, p. 129) defined
ESP as "an approach to language teaching in which all decisions as to content and method are based on the
learner's reason for learning".
The situation in the Indonesian context is
even more complicated as there is not even a separation between ESP and English
for General Purposes (EGP) when it comes to syllabuses and methodology, and who
is better trained to teach what. Needs assessment, which is a major component
of ESP, never exists, and, if does, it is never systematic, but rather based on
teachers' instuitions.
The aim of this paper is to shed light
on some of the major aspects of ESP discussed in the literature to reach a
better understanding of this kind of English teaching. The first section definition of ESP, and then the differences
of ESP, the purpose of learning ESP, and the last are some examples of ESP
material to learn.
DISCUSSION
2.1 The Definition of ESP
According Hutchinson and Waters (1987, p. 19) as cited in Tsao (2011, p. 129) defined
ESP as "an approach to language teaching in which all decisions as to content and method are based on the
learner's reason for learning". In
the view of Chen (1993, p. 80),
ESP is “a major specialization within
the discipline of English language teaching”. Still,
others specified ESP as
the teaching of English for academic studies, or for vocational or professional purposes, as opposed to EGP, English for
general knowledge and skills (Brunton, 2009;
Carver, 1983; Hyland, 2006).
Peter Strevens (1988, pp.1-2) as
cited in Valeria (2010, p. 49) defines English for
Specific Purposes (ESP) by making a distinction between its absolute and its
variable characteristics. He considers as absolute characteristics the
following. ESP –the English language teaching is:
·
Designed to meet specified needs of the learner;
·
Related in content (i.e. themes and topics) to particular
disciplines, occupations and activities;
·
Centred on the language appropriate for those activities in syntax,
lexis, discourse and semantics;
·
In contrast with General
English.
Robinson
(1991) as cited in Valeria (2010, p. 50) defines
ESP on the basis of two criteria:
1.
ESP is normally “goal-directed” and
2.
ESP courses develop from a needs analysis which
aims to specify what exactly it is that students have to do through the medium
of English, and from a number of characteristics which explain that ESP courses
are generally constrained by a limited period of time in which their objectives
have to be achieved and taught to adults in homogenous classes in terms of the
work or specialist studies.
According to Day and Krzanowski (2011, p. 5) ESP (English for
Specific Purposes) involves teaching and learning the specific skills and language needed by particular learners
for a particular purpose.
Based on the
explanation above English
for Specific Purposes (ESP) is a learner-centred approach to teaching English
as an additional language, which focuses on developing communicative competence
in a specific discipline, such as accounting, business, education, engineering, IT
technology, academic writing and learning.
2.2
The Differences
of ESP with General English
The
question of the difference between ESP and EGP has been addressed in the
literature in terms of theory and practice. Hutchinson and Waters (1987) state
that there is no difference between the two in theory; however, there is a
great deal of difference in practice. ESP differs from EGP in the sense that
the words and sentences learned and the subject matter discussed are all
relevant to a particular field or discipline. The design of syllabuses for ESP
is directed towards serving the needs of learners seeking for or developing
themselves in a particular occupation or specializing in a specific academic
field. ESP courses make use of vocabulary tasks related to the field such as
negotiation skills and effective techniques for oral presentations. A balance
is created between educational theory and practical considerations. ESP also
increases learners' skills in using English.
A deeper
investigation, however, of the difference between the two is required. English
for General Purposes (EGP) is essentially the English language education in
junior and senior high schools. Learners are introduced to the sounds and
symbols of English, as well as to the lexical/grammatical/rhetorical elements
that compose spoken and written discourse. There is no particular situation
targeted in this kind of language learning. Rather, it focuses on applications
in general situations: appropriate dialogue with restaurant staff, bank
tellers, postal clerks, telephone operators, English teachers, and party guests
as well as lessons on how to read and write the English typically found in
textbooks, newspapers, magazines, etc. EGP curriculums also include cultural
aspects of the second language. EGP conducted in English-speaking countries
is typically called ESL, and EGP conducted in non-English-speaking countries is
normally called EFL. EGP is typically viewed as a level that precedes
higher-level instruction in ESP if ESP programs are to yield satisfactory
results.
Thus, ESP
is centred on the language appropriate to the activities of a given discipline.
According to Hutchinson and Waters (1987, p. 19) as
cited in Tsao (2011, p. 129), "ESP is an
approach to language teaching in which all decisions as to content and method
are based on the learner's reason for learning."
2.3
The Purpose of Learning ESP
The main objective of teaching and learning a foreign
language is to provide the learners with communicative competence, linguistic
competence and cultural competence. Basturkmen
(2006) describes five objectives in teaching ESP. They are:
1.
To reveal subject-specific language use aims to show how English is used in the
target environment and to impart to students the knowledge about it that has
been revealed by linguistic research in the field. This objective is linked to
the linguistic knowledge objective and to a lesser extent, the cultural
knowledge objective.
2.
To develop target performance competencies focus on developing the ability to
perform the activities of an occupation and function to the standard expected
to those employed in that occupation. Courses are organized around core skills
and competencies that are also subdivided into micro skills and more specific
competencies.
3.
To teach underlying knowledge. Using a second or foreign language for a
workplace or study purposes requires not only linguistic proficiency and
knowledge but also knowledge and understanding of work-related and disciplinary
concepts; underlying competencies refers to disciplinary concepts from the
students’ field of study.
4. To develop strategic competence. The
link between context of situation and language knowledge and can be defined as
the means that enables language knowledge and content knowledge to be used in
communication.
5. To foster critical awareness. Enabling
students to become accepted members
of those target environments, and all have a shared understanding that ESP can
best help students attain this end by helping them develop the skill and
knowledge they need to produce acceptable language in those environment.
2.4
Some Examples of ESP Material to Learn
1.
Listening
Listening
comprehension, although vital for communication in English, is usually the most
neglected of the language skills in English programs. As a native speaker, we have a unique advantage in developing listening
comprehension skills in our students. Everything that we
say in the classroom can be useful in developing the students'
listening abilities.
To be effective,
however, our spoken communications with the class must be comprehensible.
Language which is not understood is just "noise" and does not lead to
student language acquisition. For this reason, it is important for us to gauge our students' level of comprehension and adjust
our speech to reflect their understanding. we
should spend some time at the beginning of our course to be sure we are understood. Our students may be
accustomed to hearing a British accent, for example, and may need time to adjust
to us. Look at our students carefully as we talk to get
cues about their comprehension. Check comprehension frequently by asking
questions about content which require listening comprehension, or by asking for
questions or comments.
The cloze exercise
is a good way to check the students' listening comprehension.
Give them a short passage with some words deleted. Read the passage aloud
twice. If they are unable to fill in the missing words, they are unable to make
sense of the passage. Other ways of using cloze exercises include deleting
articles or verbs, for example, if we are working on these
forms, to focus students' attention on these language structures. The
tape recorder is a valuable asset to the language teacher.
2.
Reading
Reading is the primary channel through
which our students will progress in English after our course is over. A good
reading program provides instruction in the skills required at various levels
of reading, along with plenty of practice in this skill, which can only be
developed through extensive and continual practice. Two types
of skills are needed in reading: simple identification skills, (decoding) and
higher level cognitive skills such as analyzing, synthesizing, and predicting. The reading
program should work on two levels to develop both types of skill.
In order to do this, the program
should incorporate two types of reading tasks: intensive and extensive.
Intensive reading is close analysis of a short passage and can be used to
develop vocabulary, grammar skills, and comprehension. Extensive reading is
faster reading of longer passages to develop understanding of writers'
organizational strategies, to improve reading speed, and to focus on main
ideas.
3.
Writing and Grammar
Understanding and
communicating in English is within the students' reach even if they don't
understand the fine points of grammar. The ability to function in English is
not directly linked to accuracy of grammatical use or pronunciation. Students
need to be encouraged to use English even if they make mistakes. The main
purpose of language use, after all, is communication.
Some instruction
in grammar is necessary, however. Especially in written work, learning grammar
rules can help students to recognize and correct their errors. In preparing to
teach grammar, be sure we have a good understanding of the
structures that we want to teach, so that presentation is clear. It is also
important that students be able to use the grammar they practice. One way to
ensure that students can make effective use of what they learn is to teach
grammar in conjunction with writing, the skill in which it can best be
practiced. In speaking, we do not usually have the time to remember and apply
rules of grammar, but in writing we have ample opportunity to monitor our
usage. It is in writing that grammar instruction is most useful. The
grammatical forms which are most useful and most learnable are those which
control sentence-level functions such as question form, negation, relative
clause formation and other structures involved in subordination and
coordination. These features are more important than correct usage of articles
or other no sentence-level features. Focusing on paragraph features such as, tense continuity across clauses, parallel structure, and
connectors, will help students in reading comprehension as well
4.
Speaking
Assesment need will determine whether the
development of speaking skill is a goal in ESP class. For many ESP
situations, development of speaking skills may be beyond the scope of what it
is possible for
teacher to provide every student with practice
in speaking is an inefficient use of classroom time. Discussion groups are
notoriously difficult to manage. Students rarely listen to each other talk and
conversation degenerates into one student after another saying unrelated
things. If teaching speaking skills is one of the
objectives; for example, in an ESP class in English for Tourism, we will need to select activities that reflect the real
functions for which the students will use English.
Pronunciation is
often overstressed in language teaching and should play a restricted role in the class, and also Role playing is an effective
way to stimulate conversation in the classroom. We
can use flowcharts to outline a situation which
want to use as a base for developing students' speaking skills.
CONCLUSION
This paper
explain the concepts of ESP, According Hutchinson
and Waters (1987, p. 19) as cited in Tsao (2011, p. 129) defined
ESP as "an approach to language teaching in which all decisions as to content and method are based on the
learner's reason for learning". ESP differs from EGP in the sense that the words and sentences
learned and the subject matter discussed are all relevant to a particular field
or discipline. The purpose of learning ESP that to
reveal subject-specific language,
to
develop target performance competencies, to
teach underlying knowledge,
to
develop strategic competence,
and to
foster critical awareness.
Some examples of ESP material to learn such as listening, reading, speaking,
writing, grammar.
Teachers nowadays, however, are much more aware of
the importance of needs analysis, and materials writers think very carefully
about the goals of learners at all stages of materials production. Perhaps this
demonstrates the influence that the ESP approach has had on English teaching in
general. Clearly the line where General English courses stop and ESP courses
start has become very vague indeed.
REFERENCES
Basturkmen, H. (2006). Ideas and
Opinions in English for Specific Purpose. New York. Routledge.
Brunton, M. (2009). An
account of ESP – with possible future directions. English for Specific Purposes Issue, 3(24),
Vol. 8. Retrieved May 1, 2013 from
Carver, D. (1983). Some
propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2, 131-137. Retrieved May 1, 2013 from
Chen, Y. H. (2008). Chuanchouhwa shihtai
yingyu de weilai─yingyu tsowei dieryuyen de hsuehhsi tseluei.
[The future of English in the globalized age learning strategies for English as
the second language]. English Career, 27, 21-27.
Day, J and Krzanowski, M. (2011). Teaching
English for Specific Purpose an Introduction. Cambridge. Cambridge
University Press.
Hutchinson, T.,
& Waters, A. 1987. English for
Specific Purposes: A learning-centered approach. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Tsao, C. H. (2008). English-learning motivation and needs
analysis: a case study of technological
university students in Taiwan. Paper presented at the Basic Research Conference of Chinese Military Academy on its 84th school anniversary.
May 6, 2008. Fongshang, Taiwan.
Valeria, A. (2010). A General View on
the Relationship between ESP and EGP. Proffesional Communication and
Translation Studies. Vol. 3. (1-2) / 2010 Politehnica University Timisoara.